<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Driscoll, through phone&#8217;s-eye view</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/archives/281/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/archives/281</link>
	<description>Bringing you news from Beeman, Kirsten, and Driscoll since 2009</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:34:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/archives/281/comment-page-1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 06:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/?p=281#comment-100</guid>
		<description>I just googled [Beeman nudity] ... er, for the first time ... and your blog comes up tops. Congrats. Also, you didn&#039;t fix the tags. You lied. You lied to me through blog comments.

As for 4:22am, I&#039;ll give you three hints as to why I was up at that hour: (1) S, (2) i, (3) monwasscreamingandwouldntstopbecausehewashungrysoifedhim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just googled [Beeman nudity] &#8230; er, for the first time &#8230; and your blog comes up tops. Congrats. Also, you didn&#8217;t fix the tags. You lied. You lied to me through blog comments.</p>
<p>As for 4:22am, I&#8217;ll give you three hints as to why I was up at that hour: (1) S, (2) i, (3) monwasscreamingandwouldntstopbecausehewashungrysoifedhim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beeman</title>
		<link>http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/archives/281/comment-page-1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Beeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/?p=281#comment-97</guid>
		<description>By the way Todd, 4:22am?  Were you that anxious for the next blog post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way Todd, 4:22am?  Were you that anxious for the next blog post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beeman</title>
		<link>http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/archives/281/comment-page-1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Beeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/?p=281#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;ll provide fodder for the many folks out there googling &quot;Beeman&quot; and &quot;nudity&quot;.  And good point about the tagging!  Fixed.

With the strawberry patch, yes, we&#039;ve been encouraging &quot;gun&quot; games with the little guy.  It&#039;s what post-progressive parents do these days.  Up next: pretend drugs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;ll provide fodder for the many folks out there googling &#8220;Beeman&#8221; and &#8220;nudity&#8221;.  And good point about the tagging!  Fixed.</p>
<p>With the strawberry patch, yes, we&#8217;ve been encouraging &#8220;gun&#8221; games with the little guy.  It&#8217;s what post-progressive parents do these days.  Up next: pretend drugs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/archives/281/comment-page-1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beemanandkirsten.com/blog/?p=281#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Man, how does this post not rate a &quot;brief nudity&quot; tag? Is it because the nudity is out-and-out full-backal PG-level? Or is this a case more of &quot;prolonged nudity&quot;?

My favorite is Driscoll in the strawberry patch. I&#039;d like to think he&#039;s saying &quot;gotcha!&quot; As if perhaps you were the sucker who put all the work into growing these things, and he&#039;s eating them for free! Chump!

I also enjoy the very carefully composed penultimate photo, in which a leaf thankfully covers up what would otherwise be a wide-open shot of Beeman&#039;s crotch. I assume that this is because Beeman is wearing his, um, &quot;special&quot; jeans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, how does this post not rate a &#8220;brief nudity&#8221; tag? Is it because the nudity is out-and-out full-backal PG-level? Or is this a case more of &#8220;prolonged nudity&#8221;?</p>
<p>My favorite is Driscoll in the strawberry patch. I&#8217;d like to think he&#8217;s saying &#8220;gotcha!&#8221; As if perhaps you were the sucker who put all the work into growing these things, and he&#8217;s eating them for free! Chump!</p>
<p>I also enjoy the very carefully composed penultimate photo, in which a leaf thankfully covers up what would otherwise be a wide-open shot of Beeman&#8217;s crotch. I assume that this is because Beeman is wearing his, um, &#8220;special&#8221; jeans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
